雷竞技app官方版下载ios-雷竞技官方平台
doi: 10.11781/sysydz202402380
1.
中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
2.
中国石油 新疆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
3.
中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083
4.
中国石油工程技术研究院 北京石油机械有限公司, 北京 102206
详细信息
中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083
中国石油 新疆油田分公司 勘探开发研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083
中国石油工程技术研究院 北京石油机械有限公司, 北京 102206
Source rock evaluation and prediction of effective hydrocarbon kitchen distribution of Upper Triassic in Junggar Basin
1.
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
3.
School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
4.
Beijing Petroleum Machinery Co., Ltd., CNPC Engineering Technology R & D Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China
Research Institute of Exploration and Development, PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
Beijing Petroleum Machinery Co., Ltd., CNPC Engineering Technology R & D Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China
雷竞技官方平台:
准噶尔盆地蕴含丰富的油气资源，已于多个层位取得油气勘探发现。然而，上三叠统厚层泥岩能否作为盆地有效烃源岩一直没有明确的定论，亟需开展全盆范围内上三叠统烃源岩评价工作并进行有效源灶分布预测，为该层系下一步勘探部署提供依据。为进一步明确准噶尔盆地上三叠统烃源岩时空分布特征及其生烃潜力，落实有效烃源灶分布范围内生烃强度，基于资料收集、剖面实测、钻孔岩屑观察采样和有机地球化学测试，利用多个地化参数开展了全盆范围上三叠统烃源岩有机质丰度、类型、成熟度评价，优选关键参数利用多层次模糊数学评价方法，圈定有效源灶范围。结果表明，上三叠统烃源岩分布范围广(基本全盆分布)、厚度大(可达350 m)、腹部埋深大(最大埋深11 km)；烃源岩TOC含量为0.75%~8.3%，平均值为1.74%；S1+S2平均为2.78 mg/g，氯仿沥青“A”平均为0.354%；有机质类型以Ⅲ型和Ⅱ2型为主，陆源高等植物输入占优，相对较好的母质类型主要沿盆1井西凹陷—阜康凹陷方向分布，有机质成熟度处于低成熟—成熟热演化阶段，局部达高—过成熟阶段。按照中国煤系泥岩生烃潜力评价标准，上三叠统泥岩整体为一套差—中等质量烃源岩，烃源岩总体上具有一定的生烃潜力，特别是生气潜力。有效烃源灶分布于中央坳陷腹部的阜康凹陷西部—沙湾凹陷东部一带以及南缘冲断带的霍玛吐背斜带，有效烃源灶范围内烃源岩Ro大于1.3%，生油强度在50×104 t/km2以上，生气强度在3×108 m3/km2以上。
Abstract:
The Junggar Basin is known for its high potential of petroleum resources, showcasing significant oil and gas discoveries across various layers. However, the potential of utilizing the thick mudstone of the Upper Triassic as a viable source rock in the basin remains uncertain. Therefore, an urgent need exists to assess the Upper Triassic source rock across the basin and predict the distribution of effective source rocks. This evaluation is crucial for informing future exploration strategies in this layer. To shed light on the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of the Upper Triassic source rocks in the Junggar Basin, as well as to determine the hydrocarbon generation intensity within the effective hydrocarbon kitchen's distribution range, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted. This evaluation involved assessing organic matter abundance, type, and maturity of the Upper Triassic source rock across the basin using various geochemical parameters derived from data collection, profile measurement, drill cuttings observation and sampling, and organic geochemistry testing. Key parameters were then selected, and a multi-level fuzzy mathematical evaluation method was employed to map out the development range of the effective hydrocarbon kitchen. The findings indicate that the Upper Triassic source rock exhibits a broad distribution range spanning the entire basin, with considerable thickness (reaching up to 350 m) and significant burial depth in the central region (up to 11 000 m). The total organic carbon (TOC) content of source rocks varies from 0.75% to 8.30%, with an average value of 1.74%. Additionally, the average values of S1+S2 and chloroform asphalt "A" are 2.78 mg/g and 0.354%, respectively. The predominant organic matter types in the area are type Ⅲ and type Ⅱ2, indicating a dominance of terrestrial higher plant inputs. The favorable kerogen types are primarily located from the western sag to the Fukang Sag. The thermal evolution of the organic matter ranges from low-maturity to mature stages, with some areas reaching high to over-maturity levels. As per the evaluation criteria for hydrocarbon generation potential of coal-bearing mudstone in China, the Upper Triassic mudstone generally represents poor to medium-quality source rocks with significant hydrocarbon generation potential, particularly for gas. The key hydrocarbon source kitchens are situated from the western part of the Fukang Sag to the eastern part of the Shawan Sag in the central depression, and in the Huomatu Anticline of the southern margin thrust belt. Within these areas, the Ro value of the source rock exceeds 1.3%, with oil and gas generation intensities reaching 50×104 t/km2 and 3×108 m3/km2, respectively.
图 2 准噶尔盆地白杨河上三叠统郝家沟组、黄山街组实测剖面柱状图及采样位置
Figure 2. Histograms of measured profiles and sampling locations of Upper Triassic Haojiagou-Huangshanjie formations in Baiyanghe River, Junggar Basin
图 3 准噶尔盆地上三叠统泥岩总厚度等值线
Figure 3. Contours of total thickness of Upper Triassic mudstones in Junggar Basin
图 4 准噶尔盆地上三叠统部分泥岩样品TOC含量与S1+S2关系
Figure 4. Relation between TOC and S1+S2 of part of Upper Triassic mudstone samples in Junggar Basin
图 5 准噶尔盆地上三叠统泥岩有机质类型IH—Tmax和D—Tmax判别
Figure 5. IH-Tmax, D-Tmax discrimination of organic matter types of Upper Triassic mudstones in Junggar Basin
图 6 准噶尔盆地上三叠统烃源岩ααα-C27-C28-C29甾烷三角图
Figure 6. ααα- C27-C28-C29 sterane triangle of Upper Triassic source rocks in Junggar Basin
图 7 准噶尔盆地中央凹陷腹部上三叠统泥岩埋深与Ro关系
Figure 7. Relationship between burial depth and Ro of Upper Triassic mudstones in central sag of Junggar Basin
图 8 准噶尔盆地上三叠统烃源岩C29ββ/(ββ+αα) 与C2920S/(20S+20R)成熟度关系
Figure 8. C29ββ/(ββ+αα) vs. C2920S/(20S+20R) maturity discrimination of Upper Triassic source rocks in Junggar Basin
图 9 准噶尔盆地上三叠统烃源岩Ro值平面分布
Figure 9. Ro isogram of Upper Triassic source rocks in Junggar Basin
图 10 准噶尔盆地上三叠统有效烃源灶预测结果
Figure 10. Prediction results of effective source range of Upper Triassic in Junggar Basin
表 1 准噶尔盆地上三叠统泥岩有机质丰度分布
Table 1. Distribution of organic matter abundance of Upper Triassic mudstones in Junggar Basin
地区
ω(TOC)/%
(S1+S2)/(mg/g)
氯仿沥青“A”/%
丰度评价
分布特征
级别
分布特征
级别
分布特征
级别
乌伦古坳陷
$ \frac{0.79\sim 3.3}{1.46(19)}$
差
$ \frac{0.53\sim 9.42}{1.86(18)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.15\sim 0.264}{0.216(13)}$
差
差—中等
陆梁隆起
$ \frac{0.81\sim 1.59}{1.36(16)}$
差
$ \frac{0.57\sim 5.8}{2.27(19)}$
差
$ \frac{0.17\sim 0.342}{0.197(16)}$
差
差
玛湖凹陷
$ \frac{0.83\sim 6.0}{2.08(31)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.61\sim 20.53}{3.75(29)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.27\sim 1.142}{0.572(5)}$
中等
中等
中央坳陷腹部
$ \frac{0.75\sim 3.1}{1.69(125)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.5\sim 8.32}{2.62(115)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.15\sim 0.304}{0.241(21)}$
差
差—中等
南缘冲断带
$ \frac{0.77\sim 8.3}{1.82(79)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.56\sim 33.89}{3.03(71)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.16\sim 3.813}{0.518(34)}$
中等
中等
总体
$ \frac{0.75\sim 8.3}{1.74(270)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.5\sim 33.89}{2.78(252)}$
中等
$ \frac{0.15\sim 3.813}{0.354(89)}$
中等
中等
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 准噶尔盆地上三叠统泥岩有机质类型基础地化参数
Table 2. Basic geochemical parameters of organic matter types of Upper Triassic mudstones in Junggar Basin
地区
IH/(mg/g)
δ13C/‰
H/C
O/C
类型评价
乌伦古坳陷
$ \frac{16.01\sim 250.3}{127.85(26)}$
$ \frac{-27.4\sim -24.3}{-25.4(15)}$
$ \frac{0.68\sim 1.12}{0.82(21)}$
$ \frac{0.05\sim 0.29}{0.11(21)}$
Ⅱ—Ⅲ型
陆梁隆起
$ \frac{45.45\sim 344.29}{145.58(18)}$
Ⅱ—Ⅲ型
玛湖凹陷
$ \frac{3.85\sim 364.21}{119.22(34)}$
Ⅱ—Ⅲ型
中央坳陷腹部
$ \frac{20.34\sim 355.46}{103.62(137)}$
$ \frac{-26.8\sim -25.9}{-26.3(4)}$
$ \frac{0.13\sim 0.14}{0.13(2)}$
Ⅱ2—Ⅲ型
南缘冲断带
$ \frac{3.33\sim 283.6}{60.9(70)}$
$ \frac{-27.3\sim -22.9}{-25.4(15)}$
$ \frac{0.63\sim 0.85}{0.74(4)}$
$ \frac{0.35\sim 0.44}{0.38(4)}$
Ⅱ2—Ⅲ型
总体
$ \frac{3.33\sim 364.21}{99.85(285)}$
$ \frac{-27.4\sim -22.9}{-25.5(34)}$
$ \frac{0.13\sim 1.12}{0.76(27)}$
$ \frac{0.05\sim 0.44}{0.15(25)}$
Ⅱ2—Ⅲ型
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 准噶尔盆地上三叠统烃源岩生标评价参数分布
Table 3. Distribution of biomarker evaluation parameters of Upper Triassic source rocks in Junggar Basin
地化指标
陆梁隆起
乌伦古坳陷
玛湖凹陷
中央坳陷腹部
南缘冲断带
总体
Pr/Ph
$ \frac{0.88\sim 2.04} {1.24(13)}$
$ \frac{0.92\sim 3.18} {1.89(6)}$
$ \frac{0.57\sim 2.86} {1.50(33)}$
$ \frac{0.43\sim 3.05} {1.40(26)}$
$ \frac{0.43\sim 3.18} {1.45(78)}$
OEP
$ \frac{0.99\sim 1.18} {1.1(13)}$
$ \frac{0.98\sim 1.27} {1.16(6)}$
2.15(1)
$ \frac{0.97\sim 2.54} {1.28(33)}$
$ \frac{1.01\sim 2.67} {1.44(26)}$
$ \frac{0.97\sim 2.67} {1.27(79)}$
CPI
$ \frac{1.08\sim 1.40} {1.17(13)}$
$ \frac{1.01\sim 1.34} {1.12(6)}$
2.05(1)
$ \frac{1.06\sim 2.57} {1.40(33)}$
$ \frac{1.12\sim 2.8} {1.64(26)}$
$ \frac{1.01\sim 2.8} {1.4(79)}$
ΣC21-/ΣC22+
$ \frac{0.24\sim 2.82} {1.16(13)}$
$ \frac{0.59\sim 3.87} {1.87(6)}$
0.31(1)
$ \frac{0.42\sim 3.72} {1.49(33)}$
$ \frac{0.10\sim 2.32} {1.03(29)}$
$ \frac{0.10\sim 3.87} {1.29(82)}$
C30藿烷/C30莫烷
$ \frac{2.20\sim 7.27} {4.75(15)}$
$ \frac{3.73\sim 9.49} {5.74(6)}$
$ \frac{1.76\sim 6.33} {4.59(10)}$
$ \frac{1.93\sim 8.86} {5.39(29)}$
$ \frac{0.25\sim 9.03} {3.24(27)}$
$ \frac{0.25\sim 9.49} {4.54(87)}$
伽马蜡烷指数
$ \frac{0.06\sim 0.14} {0.10(13)}$
$ \frac{0.05\sim 0.15} {0.09(4)}$
$ \frac{0.04\sim 0.17} {0.11(7)}$
$ \frac{0.06\sim 0.23} {0.14(23)}$
$ \frac{0.03\sim 0.23} {0.12(17)}$
$ \frac{0.03\sim 0.23} {0.12(64)}$
Ts/Tm
$ \frac{0.29\sim 0.62} {0.43(15)}$
$ \frac{0.68\sim 1.92} {0.79(6)}$
$ \frac{0.04\sim 0.54} {0.32(9)}$
$ \frac{0.06\sim 1.83} {0.45(27)}$
$ \frac{0.02\sim 1.42} {0.22(27)}$
$ \frac{0.02\sim 1.92} {0.38(84)}$
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 准噶尔盆地上三叠统烃源岩热演化成熟度评价参数分布
Table 4. Distribution of evaluation parameters for thermal maturity of Upper Triassic source rocks in Junggar Basin
地区
Ro/%
Tmax/℃
H/C
成熟度评价
乌伦古坳陷
$ \frac{0.60\sim 0.92}{0.72(23)}$
$ \frac{438\sim 481}{448(20)}$
$ \frac{0.68\sim 1.12}{0.82(21)}$
低成熟—成熟
陆梁隆起
$ \frac{432\sim 455}{444(20)}$
低成熟—成熟
玛湖凹陷
$ \frac{432\sim 473}{440(34)}$
低成熟
中央坳陷腹部
$ \frac{0.59\sim 0.98}{0.67(18)}$
$ \frac{436\sim 482}{437(135)}$
$ \frac{0.13\sim 0.14}{0.13(2)}$
低成熟—成熟
南缘冲断带
$ \frac{0.50\sim 0.99}{0.80(24)}$
$ \frac{431\sim 464}{451(69)}$
$ \frac{0.63\sim 0.85}{0.74(4)}$
低成熟—成熟
总体
$ \frac{0.50\sim 0.99}{0.74(65)}$
$ \frac{431\sim 482}{442(278)}$
$ \frac{0.13\sim 1.12}{0.76(27)}$
低成熟—成熟
下载: 导出CSV
[1]
雷德文, 阿布力米提, 唐勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组油气高产区控制因素与分布预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(5): 495-499. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201405002.htmLEI Dewen, ABULIMITI, TANG Yong, et al. Controlling factors and occurrence prediction of high oil-gas production zones in Lower Triassic Baikouquan Formation of Mahu Sag in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(5): 495-499. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201405002.htm
[2]
张仲培, 张宇, 张明利, 等. 准噶尔盆地中部凹陷区二叠系-三叠系油气成藏主控因素与勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(4): 559-568. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204559ZHANG Zhongpei, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Mingli, et al. Main controlling factors and exploration direction of Permian to Triassic reservoir in the central sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(4): 559-568. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202204559
[3]
黄立良, 王然, 邹阳, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛南斜坡区上二叠统上乌尔禾组连续型砂砾岩油藏群成藏特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(1): 51-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201051HUANG Liliang, WANG Ran, ZOU Yang, et al. Accumulation characteristics of continuous sand conglomerate reservoirs of Upper Permian Upper Wuerhe Formation in Manan Slope area, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(1): 51-59. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202201051
[4]
陈建平, 王绪龙, 邓春萍, 等. 准噶尔盆地油气源、油气分布与油气系统[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(3): 421-450. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2016.03.002CHEN Jianping, WANG Xulong, DENG Chunping, et al. Oil and gas source, occurrence and petroleum system in the Junggar Basin, Northwest China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(3): 421-450. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2016.03.002
[5]
TAO Shu, TANG Dazhen, XU Hao, et al. Organic geochemistry and elements distribution in Dahuangshan oil shale, southern Junggar Basin: origin of organic matter and depositional environment[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2013, 115: 41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.05.004
[6]
雷德文, 瞿建华, 安志渊, 等. 玛湖凹陷百口泉组低渗砂砾岩油气藏成藏条件及富集规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(6): 642-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201506004.htmLEI Dewen, QU Jianhua, AN Zhiyuan, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and enrichment regularity of low-permeability glutenite reservoirs of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(6): 642-647. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201506004.htm
[7]
王惠民, 吴华, 靳涛, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘油气富集规律[J]. 新疆地质, 2005, 23(3): 278-282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2005.03.014WANG Huimin, WU Hua, JIN Tao, et al. Rule of hydrocarbons accumulation in the northwest edge of Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2005, 23(3): 278-282. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2005.03.014
[8]
蔚远江, 李德生, 胡素云, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘扇体形成演化与扇体油气藏勘探[J]. 地球学报, 2007, 28(1): 62-71. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2007.01.010YU Yuanjiang, LI Desheng, HU Suyun, et al. Fans sedimentation and exploration direction of fan hydrocarbon reservoirs in foreland thrust belt of the northwestern Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2007, 28(1): 62-71. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-3021.2007.01.010
[9]
李兵, 党玉芳, 贾春明, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘中拐-五八区二叠系碎屑岩沉积相特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(3): 432-439. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201103010.htmLI Bing, DANG Yufang, JIA Chunming, et al. Sedimentary facies of Permian clastic rocks in Zhongguai-Wuba area in northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(3): 432-439. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201103010.htm
[10]
陈书平, 况军, 刘继山, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘克-百地区不整合面及其动力学条件[J]. 高校地质学报, 2008, 14(2): 199-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2008.02.009CHEN Shuping, KUANG Jun, LIU Jishan, et al. Major unconformities and their dynamic conditions in Ke-Bai area, northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2008, 14(2): 199-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2008.02.009
[11]
况军, 齐雪峰. 准噶尔前陆盆地构造特征与油气勘探方向[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2006, 27(1): 5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.01.002KUANG Jun, QI Xuefeng. The structural characteristics and oil-gas explorative direction in Junggar Foreland Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2006, 27(1): 5-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.01.002
[12]
陶国亮, 胡文瑄, 张义杰, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘北西向横断裂与油气成藏[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(4): 23-28. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.04.005TAO Guoliang, HU Wenxuan, ZHANG Yijie, et al. NW-trending transverse faults and hydrocarbon accumulation in the northwestern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(4): 23-28. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.04.005
[13]
朱宝清, 冯益民. 新疆西准噶尔板块构造及演化[J]. 新疆地质, 1994, 12(2): 95-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI402.000.htmZHU Baoqing, FENG Yimin. Plate tectonics and evolution in West Junggar of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 1994, 12(2): 95-104. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJDI402.000.htm
[14]
何登发, 张磊, 吴松涛, 等. 准噶尔盆地构造演化阶段及其特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(5): 845-861. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201805002.htmHE Dengfa, ZHANG Lei, WU Songtao, et al. Tectonic evolution stages and features of the Junggar Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(5): 845-861. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201805002.htm
[15]
陈书平, 漆家福, 于福生, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘构造变形特征及其主控因素[J]. 地质学报, 2007, 81(2): 151-157. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.02.002CHEN Shuping, QI Jiafu, YU Fusheng, et al. Deformation characte-ristics in the southern margin of the Junggar Basin and their controlling factors[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(2): 151-157. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.02.002
[16]
吴孔友, 查明, 王绪龙, 等. 准噶尔盆地成藏动力学系统划分[J]. 地质论评, 2007, 53(1): 75-82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2007.01.010WU Kongyou, ZHAI Ming, WANG Xulong, et al. Pool-forming dynamic system division in Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2007, 53(1): 75-82. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.2007.01.010
[17]
张义杰, 齐雪峰, 程显胜, 等. 准噶尔盆地晚石炭世和二叠纪沉积环境[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2007, 28(6): 673-675. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.06.003ZHANG Yijie, QI Xuefeng, CHENG Xiansheng, et al. Approach to sedimentary environment of Late Carboniferous-Permian in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2007, 28(6): 673-675. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2007.06.003
[18]
陈书平, 张一伟, 汤良杰. 准噶尔晚石炭世-二叠纪前陆盆地的演化[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(5): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200105003.htmCHEN Shuping, ZHANG Yiwei, TANG Liangjie. Evolution of Junggar Late Carboniferous-Permian Foreland Basin[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, 2001, 25(5): 11-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200105003.htm
[19]
张继庆, 江新胜, 刘志刚, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘三叠-侏罗系沉积模式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1992, 13(3): 206-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD199203003.htmZHANG Jiqing, JIANG Xinsheng, LIU Zhigang, et al. Sedimentation model for the Triassic and Jurassic strata of the northwestern margin in Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1992, 13(3): 206-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD199203003.htm
[20]
何苗, 张利伟, 刘勇, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘三叠纪沉积体系与环境[J]. 地质通报, 2017, 36(6): 1032-1042. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2017.06.015HE Miao, ZHANG Liwei, LIU Yong, et al. Sedimentary system and environment research on the Triassic strata in northwest Junggar Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(6): 1032-1042. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2017.06.015
[21]
陈建平, 赵长毅, 何忠华. 煤系有机质生烃潜力评价标准探讨[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1997, 24(1): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK199701000.htmCHEN Jianping, ZHAO Changyi, HE Zhonghua. Criteria for evaluating the hydrocarbon generating potential of organic matter in coal measures[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1997, 24(1): 1-5. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SKYK199701000.htm
[22]
张韩静, 李素梅, 高永进, 等. 准噶尔盆地东南缘二叠系芦草沟组烃源岩有机地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(6): 1538-1550. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ202206009.htmZHANG Hanjing, LI Sumei, GAO Yongjin, et al. Organic geoche-mical characteristics of source rocks of Permian Lucaogou Formation in southeastern of Junggar Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(6): 1538-1550. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDDZ202206009.htm
[23]
TAO Shu, SHAN Yansheng, TANG Dazhen, et al. Mineralogy, major and trace element geochemistry of Shichanggou oil shales, Jimusaer, southern Junggar Basin, China: implications for provenance, palaeoenvironment and tectonic setting[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2016, 146: 432-445. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.06.014
[24]
QIAO Jinqi, LUO Qingyong, ZHANG Ye, et al. Formation conditions and enrichment mechanisms of the Jurassic lacustrine organic-rich shale in the east Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin, NW China: a reassessment based on organic geochemistry[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2023, 11: 1086827. doi: 10.3389/feart.2023.1086827
[25]
PETERS K E, WALTERS C C, MOLDOWAN J M. The biomarker guide: volume 1: biomarkers and isotopes in the environment and human history[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 1-1155.
[26]
陈建平, 王绪龙, 邓春萍, 等. 准噶尔盆地烃源岩与原油地球化学特征[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(1): 37-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201601003.htmCHEN Jianping, WANG Xulong, DENG Chunping, et al. Geoche-mical features of source rocks and crude oil in the Junggar Basin, Northwest China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016, 90(1): 37-67. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE201601003.htm
[27]
康素芳, 向宝力, 廖健德, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘三叠系烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(2): 43-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201202008.htmKANG Sufang, XIANG Baoli, LIAO Jiande, et al. Organic geoche-mistry of Triassic source rock in the southern Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Techno-logy Edition), 2012, 34(2): 43-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201202008.htm
[28]
王斌, 吴明, 王绪龙, 等. 准噶尔盆地腹部三叠系烃源岩特征与评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(2): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201102001.htmWANG Bin, WU Ming, WANG Xulong, et al. Source rock features and evaluation of Triassic strata in the central Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Techno-logy Edition), 2011, 33(2): 12-20. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNSY201102001.htm
[29]
刘超威, 尤新才, 李辉, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷芦草沟组烃源岩地球化学特征与生烃潜力研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 338-346. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302338LIU Chaowei, YOU Xincai, LI Hui, et al. Geochemical characte-ristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of Lucaogou Formation source rocks in Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 338-346. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202302338
[30]
王力, 金强. 柴达木盆地西部第三系烃源灶及其对油气聚集的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(4): 467-472. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200504014.htmWANG Li, JIN Qiang. Tertiary hydrocarbon kitchen in western Qaidam Basin and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2005, 26(4): 467-472. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT200504014.htm
[31]
龙华山, 李剑, 王绪龙, 等. 克拉美丽气田有效烃源灶分布及其控藏作用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(5): 500-506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201405003.htmLONG Huashan, LI Jian, WANG Xulong, et al. Effective hydrocarbon kitchen in Kelameili Gas Field of Junggar Basin and its control on hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(5): 500-506. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XJSD201405003.htm
[32]
蒲一帆, 汤达祯, 陶树, 等. 新疆阜康地区多煤层组合条件下开发层段评价优选[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(7): 2321-2330. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB202107026.htmPU Yifan, TANG Dazhen, TAO Shu, et al. Evaluation and optimization of development intervals under conditions of multiple coal seam combinations in Fukang area, Xinjiang Province[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(7): 2321-2330. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MTXB202107026.htm
[33]
蔚远江, 王红岩, 刘德勋, 等. 中国陆相雷竞技app官方版下载ios油示范区发展现状及建设可行性评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(1): 191-205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202301013.htmYU Yuanjiang, WANG Hongyan, LIU Dexun, et al. Development status and feasibility evaluation index system of continental shale oil demonstration area in China[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1): 191-205. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DQKX202301013.htm
点击查看大图
图(10) / 表(4)
苏公网安备32021102000780号